Sunday, February 23, 2025
Home2017-18-Vol3-Issue1OXYMORON OF LIFE-DEATH BY RAREST OF RARE DOCTRINE UNDERCAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN INDIA:...

OXYMORON OF LIFE-DEATH BY RAREST OF RARE DOCTRINE UNDERCAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN INDIA: A JUDICIAL ANTINOMY

“[The] death penalty is irrevocable; it cannot be recalled. It extinguishes the flame of life
forever…It is by reason of its cold and cruel finality that death penalty is qualitatively different from
all other forms of punishment.”2 -P. N. Bhagwati, J.
INTRODUCTION
Death penalty has undeniably become a topic of heated debate across the globe in contemporary
era. The sentence of killing a person by virtue of judicious and discerning judicial opinion has raised
plethora of questions upon the very nature of death penalty under legal framework. The timeless
antiquity of death penalty and its precise utility under modern times with the garb of deterrence or
retribution can be a topic of independent research. However, the way in which a criminal justice
system operates the very life and death of an offender necessarily requires a revisit in order to cross
section the actual foundation of death penalty under the law books. The fate of death sentence has
been predominantly shaped by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India under the landmark precedent
of Bachan Singh3 while giving birth to the doctrine of rarest of rare. However, the application of the
‘rarest of rare’ doctrine suffered from an inherent divergence pertaining to its inconsistent usage. The
judiciary has itself made it an eternal paradox
that, the underpinnings laid down under Bachan Singh’s case left so behind and at present it has
become an atlas task to summarise the fundamental foundations of this doctrines. Duering the passage
of time, various sub factors and patterns got originated which have subsided and deviated the core
ethos of rarest of rare doctrine, Thus, in order to understand the sentencing of death penalty in India,
there warrants a deep dive into the underpinnings of rarest of rare doctrine. Present article attempts
to address the paradox transpired within judicial precedents under cases of capital punishment and
endeavours to encapsulate the ethos laid by Apex Court for the same in a nutshell

2017-18-Vol3-Issue1-_12-1
RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments